> Considering the potential configuration complexity and resource
> requirements (1 port/source, etc.) required with the current setup, can
> I
> reverse the sink/connector, source/listener configuration such that the
> sink uses the listener? Or, is there some other way to more efficiently
> accomplish the one-to-many, sink-to-source objective?
Yes, just make it reverse. The routing connection is independent and it
doesn't matter which side establishes the connection. So in your case the
sink router should have the routing listener on some port and all the
source routers have a connector.
--
Andreas Mueller, IIT GmbH, Bremen/Germany, http://www.iit.de
SwiftMQ - JMS Enterprise Messaging System, http://www.swiftmq.com
------------------------------------------------------
SwiftMQ developers mailing list * http://www.swiftmq.com
To unsubscribe from this list, send an eMail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and write in the body of your message:
UNSUBSCRIBE developers <your-email-address>
Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
