Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Daniel wrote: >> >>>There is/was a second implemenation based on java mail what happend to >>>that ? Somehow >>>it was not included in the core. If my memory is correct it was Case >>>(iffr) who made it. >>> >>>I personally would not update the old one (well simple fix) but >>>use/default the java mail >>>one. >> >>I attached the "JMSendMail.java" file that implements the MMBase Sendmail >>interface using JavaMail. >> >>Problem is that not all methods have been re-implemented, which is why I >>never committed the file. I always managed to find tasks of higher >>priority than completing this file. >> >>Note that the two implementations can co-exist in the source tree as the >>choice of implementation class is an option of the sendmail.xml >>configuration. >> > > > I'm +1 for adding this implementation to CVS, perhaps with the notition that > it is not yet complete, but at least it can be more easily picked up by > some-one then.
I'm also ok with it. Gerard
