On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 15:25, Wilbert Hengst wrote: > Johannes Verelst wrote: > > If nobody objects, I'll check it in somewhere next week. > Sounds good. Just a thought: should we limit the maximum number of > generators that may be spawned, like we do with the Imagic Magic > convert tool?
That could possibly be implemented, but it would take quite a bit of work though (I'm not sure if this would still be a bugfix or more a hack). I've noticed that the swift flash-generator doesn't take too much resources. A call to imagemagick can result in quite a bit of CPU load, but calls to swift are usually very quick. I think that generating all necessary data (getting images from mmbase, saving them to disk, etc) takes more time than the actual transformation done by swift. Johannes -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
