Eduard Witteveen wrote: > On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 17:32, Gerard van Enk wrote: > >>I think it *is* worth discussing. Because if we start using j2ee, does >>that mean MMBase requires a full j2ee applicationserver? Are we going to >>make MMBase j2ee compliant? etc. > > > The only package from the j2ee.jar that is not used currently inside > MMBase is the javax.sql(jdbc.jar) stuff.
Oh? I didn't know we're using: javax.ejb.*, javax.jms.*, javax.resource.* javax.security.*, javax.transaction.* ;-) > I think it is better to download it at once, instead of everything > seperate and hope it cooperates with eachother. > > IRCC: When we use the j2ee.jar, the only other package's we need are: > junit.jar > log4j.jar > (optional jai stuff...) > > BUT: i dont know if the editwizards cooperate with the version of xalan > and xerces from the j2ee package Gerard
