Pierre van Rooden wrote: > Gerard van Enk wrote: > >>> And what do people think - do we need more states? Maybe TEMPORARY >>> (or HIDDEN)- for the transaction manager's temporary fields? >> >> >> Aren't these two different things? Maybe use hidden for user-definied >> hidden fields and temp for temporary fields? Fields that need to be >> calculated or something like that? > > > That's what VIRTUAL field are for. User-defined hidden fields do not > make sense (how can they be hidden if the user defines them?)
Oops, of course.... > I think of using the HIDDEN fields for fields that are needed by the > system but that the user need not know about. > Jep. Gerard
