Rob van Maris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <Daniel Ockeloen:> > > Sorry but i think supporting the internet explorer is a fact of live, > > excluding 90% of the people for > > something this silly is not a smart idea. > > I agree totally, when I complained about this recently, nobody seemed to > care.
"nobody seemed to care" is a little unjust, since AFAIK I friendly replied about what could be the cause, and we more or less together concluded that "little we can do" because it are all external products. The nifty floating table of contents though, which I added, is not working completely in IE5.5 so I just added another nifty CSS trick to hide the damn thing from IE. But i think if support for certain other style elements is missing or broken in IE5.5 then that is simply too bad, and not a bug of ours. I think btw that IE 5.5 is not the latest version anyway. How is IE 6 doing? > > Adapting the stylesheets to IExplorer is the preferable solution, but > lacking that the statement I suggested will do as a temporary measure. > These are the options we have for the upcoming release. If changing the css or overriding the xsl could make things better for IE then I'm all before, I'm just not going to do it myself. Adding a 'best viewed with' statement always seemed pretty lame to me, but even then 'be my guest' (I'd prefer saying then 'this page uses CSS2 / XHTML 1.0....'). Michiel -- mihxil' Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 []()
