Eduard Witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also the questions i asked are not answert. (I still hate the idea of > configurable ranks. They have been introduced to know what 'sort' of > user there is(cross security). You are now mis-using it as an substitute > for role's. I dont care how much ranks there are, but all ranks should > be known in all security systems.)
Ranks, roles. Similar concepts, the only difference being perhaps that a rank is a role with a 'height', and can be sorted. What excactly would be the advantage for having all ranks in all security implementatins? Yes, I could replace my security implementation, without destroying my site with <mm:cloud rank="myrank"> Otherwise I would have to make a 'role' implementation, and somehow relate it to my security user, which would I think more or less result to the same. (Replace security impl. -> my roles become useless). I still destroy my site, it would only become more difficult to make it. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL, eo, en_US mihxil' []()
