Rob van Maris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I think we can conclude that the 'new' (and default) > > storage layer does not support chained handlers? > > > > This might be an issue, isn't it? > > It sure is. It goes without saying that it should that it should support > the options available for databases in the previous databaselayer. > In addition, sqlhandlers and chainedhandlers are configurationoptions > for one particular type of queryhandler only, i.e. SqlQueryHandler. They > apply to databases but not storageproviders in general.
Something had be done about it in the mean time: #6370. I think it is pending because the maintainer (gomez) doesn't have a chainedsqlhandler to test. > The codesnippet above appears to be a hack to include the present > SqlQueryHandler configuration options. Preferably a QueryHandler should > be able to configure itself, honoring the fact that different > QueryHandlers can have different configuration options. Hmm, yes, perhaps an extra configure method would be needed then. QueryHandler#configure(Element) or so? Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
