Kees Jongenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 07 April 2004 12:20 pm, Simon Groenewolt wrote: > > I think the Jakarta HttpClient Kees suggested might be the most robust > > solution, but that will make the email application dependent on another > > library, I don't know if that's a good thing. I'll try to make a really > > simple content-type parser first. > Yes it does but its freely downloadable > And that's not true for activation and javamail.
I think that even so, depending on another application just for parsing the Content-Type is rather over kill. It can be implemented in 2 or 3 lines, which would be even less than the documetnation you would need to explain why we use httpclient in the first place. I've spoiled more bandwidth with this mail already. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen | Mediapark C101 Hilversum | +31 (0)35 6772979 | I hate Internet nl_NL eo_XX en_US | mihxil' | [] () |
