Daniel Ockeloen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> On Apr 13, 2004, at 4:13 PM, Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
> >
> > [X] +1 (YES)
> > [_] +0 (ABSTAIN )
> > [_] -1 (NO), because :
> > [_] VETO, because:
> 
> I do want remark i still feel we should remove the whole concept of 
> modules in the future and create a different way. Modules where 
> something from
> james (vpro own webserver) thats why mmbase itself is/was module still 
> seems a silly way to extend something like mmbase now.


I think the purpose of 'module' has changed now. A module is a configurable
piece of functionality which can be kickstarted by MMBase. Those two
elements are the only ones still used, and I think those can be useful.

So, I would not remove the whole concept of module, I would only remove the
silly ones, and make it work and documented more clearly.


Michiel



-- 
Michiel Meeuwissen       |
Mediapark C101 Hilversum | 
+31 (0)35 6772979        |  I hate computers
nl_NL eo_XX en_US        |
mihxil'                  |
 [] ()                   |

Reply via email to