Kees Jongenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I think one should not -1 on certain code, because other code is not good, > > I am not voting -1 because the code is "not good" . It's not in the right place > and therefore must for example hack around the cache
The thing itself is in the right place. Hacking around the cache is an implementation issue, becasue the bridge itself is "not good". I would have like to instruct the bridge not to cache the result, but that is not possible. As soon as that is possible, it can of course be removed. > isn't the size/limit code working? That I don't understand. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediacentrum 140 H'sum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
