Simon Groenewolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > I noticed that using a field 'no' on hsqldb was translated to 'm_no' in > the database. > > However, if I want to specify a constraint on a listnodes I cannot use > 'no' but have to use 'm_no' to get it to work. This is using 1.7 but I > remember this was also the case in 1.6.5.
You should never have used m_no but [no], which would have translated it to m_no if necessary. In 1.7 you can use the mm:constraint tag, and then it is not not necesary at all. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediacentrum 140 H'sum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
