> I've hacked a bit and got it working, a patch is attached. I had to change > a tiny bit of code dealing with 'field' definitions, of which I'm not sure > if it is backward compatible, and whether or not that matters.
I would like to propose this implementation as a HACK in a few days, so please send your comments on this code now, to prevent having implementation-specific comments during the hack vote. Johannes -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | It is always possible to agglutinate multiple [EMAIL PROTECTED] | seperate problems into a single complex inter- PGP ID: 0xFED127BD | dependent solution. In most cases this is a Tel: 035-6474202 | bad idea. (RFC 1925, Truth 5)
