Michiel Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: .... > It is a small bug, because it could have considered the first line of input, > if that would contain an 'encoding' indication as you did, then it could > have automaticly avoided the inconsistentency. > > On the other hand, the problem is small, because you can always not specify > the coding, UTF-8 can handle anything what you want. .. It is not always a small problem when you include external xml, dynamicly generated on another webserver. It may be that you can't control the content and if you can, you should specify de coding for generated ISO-8859-1 xml for other purposes then a buggy program.
Martijn Houtman
