Paul van Beukering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why don't you use: > > > > usernode - related - result - related - gametype > We expect lot's of users. In the passed I had difficulties with query > performance, so now I want to reduce the number of relations as much as > possible. Want to achieve this by relating as follows. > usernode - resultrelated - result > > Does this cut wood? ahum
I don't think it is a bad idea. I think using 'NODE' fields as I suggested earlier can be viewed as a kind of light weight relations. -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediacentrum 140 H'sum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
