> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Pierre van Rooden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: donderdag 24 juni 2004 16:56
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: Re: [TAGLIB] Re: The user that logged in.
> 
> 
> Ernst Bunders wrote:
> > It would have to be imlementation transparent though. If i 
> want to use an
> > ldap implementation you would have to be able to get some 
> more userinfo from
> > that source.
> 
> You could solve that with a virtual node.
> Ofcourse this means that the security layer should have a getNode() 
> method too, possibly with a default implementation that returns a 
> virtual node.

that's pretty cool. 

> 
> -- 
> Pierre van Rooden
> Mediapark, C 107 tel. +31 (0)35 6772815
> "Never summon anything bigger than your head."
> 
> 

Reply via email to