>Scanpage is a wrapper for request en response objects, isn't it? It looks a >bit like JSP's PageContext object. > >Using one object to wrap those kind of things might be a good idea, because >it will be easier to add yet another field or some functionality, but >essentially I don't think it is very essential, or suddenly very bad >practice to pass the more or less generic Request and Response interfaces in >stead.
Hmm maybe I my example wasn't that great :) I like to think of mmbase as an object database and I don't think it's good to pass the request / response to the core. (and of course if also breaks rmmci) > >The bad thing of scanpage is it's silly name and bloated implementation, and >just for that I would already not accept it. While a better alternative is >lacking, e.g. in taglib, I'd prefer somehow passing the request and response >objects themselves e.g. into functions.
<<winmail.dat>>
