Ernst Bunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The idear has merit. just link a bugreport to an answer, and there you go. > The drawback for me would be that this would make the kbase specific to the mmbase > website. > allthough.... maybe i could make it a configurable option to connect an arbitrairy > node to > an kbase answer. that would be nice. perhaps anoter application for the 'node' > fieldtype??
I don't know if the node field type is any better then just a relation here. I'd say no. By anyhow it is a more general problem: How to plug in specific things into your generic set of templates. I actually think that this issue could be addressed by the much-talked-about 'packaging' project, because 'pluggability' and 'configurability' seem to be a rather important characteristics of a package. Another example is the security implementation, there must be a way to make JSP's completely independent of that. (many jsp's now e.g. dependent on a 'loginpage', making then only work for security implementation with name/password). Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediacentrum 140 H'sum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
