Pierre van Rooden wrote: > Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > >Could't one apply the same argument as you did above? > > Probably. I can certainly make the methods protected in PageContext > (since scanpage calls them). > I don't think that would matter
I forgot that in scanpage the same methods have the wrong name indeed. Yes, why not making them protected, or simply rmeove them and make the members protected, hey, those are even public.. Could scan-page not have a public copy (could be created in the constructor). My point is that if we need a PageContext object we perhaps should make it as clean as possible. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US
