Pierre van Rooden wrote: > The jdbc.xml is not appropriate as you can use an appserver datasource > instead of the JDBC module, leaving you no place to configure.
Well, perhaps 'storage.xml' would be logical then? Which can perhaps completely replace (or contain) jdbc.xml. Aother storage related settings could then find their place in it too. > > and likewise can then be overridden bij placing a file in > WEB-INF/config/storage/database (or WEB-INF/config/storage) > > That is, imo, the simplest way to go about it. And that is excactly what my proposal would arrange. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US
