will be noticed, even though I think somewhere in the docs say 100ms.
Citrix doesn't care about lats, but you need good bandwidth. We have
clients that are having issues with remote clients that connect to via
aos where the pings are over 40ms but still under the advertised 100ms.
3.0 especially, wasn't quite as bad on 2.5.
-----Original Message-----
From: Morten Aasheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [development-axapta] Remote connection: AOS versus Citrix
All I can say that Citrix is possibly faster than AOS, but you should
use
AOS and thin-clients on the Citrix-server, otherwise you would overload
the
server easily.
Morten
-----Original Message-----
From: icydeepbluebacardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29. juni 2004 11:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [development-axapta] Remote connection: AOS versus Citrix
Hi there,
Need advise from anyone who has experience in implementing remote
connection for Axapta.
Looking at AOS versus Citrix with 64Kbps bandwidth, which one is
faster in performance?
Regards,
Frenky
Yahoo! Groups Links
Yahoo! Groups Links
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor | |
|
|
Yahoo! Groups Links
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/development-axapta/
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
