The only other way I have heard of, where multiple records are passed
across a com-connector, are passing a string containing XML.
It is probably slower but it is easier to debug etc.

But I am sure you have already investigated that option. 
/Lars
________________________________

From: Matt Benic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18. februar 2005 13:28
To: Axapta Dev
Subject: [development-axapta] Container within a container


Hi all,
I'm facing a bit of a coding dilemma. I am writing a .Net app that
requests
all customers altered in axapta after a certain time. I'm using the
Business
Connector to do this. I have written utilities that allow me to 'unpack'
a
container packed by an Axapta object and passed through COM. In this
case
though, I need to be able to return multiple objects.
If I use conins to add the individual containers to the single
container,
the individual items in each container just get added (rather than just
having a nested container). Is there another way to add these? I do not
want
to have to know how far into the container to look for each object,
since
the utilities I have written are designed to automatically populate new
csharp objects with a prticular attribute defined.
Alternatively, is there some other collection model I can use to copy my
containers into so that they all come across as separate containers?

I hope I am making sense..

Regards and thanks,

Matt Benic
Axapta and .Net Developer
UTi Sun Couriers Division

"The universal aptitude for ineptitude
makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."
- Col. John P. Stapp
www.smallfrymobile.com






________________________________

Yahoo! Groups Links
*      To visit your group on the web, go to:
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/development-axapta/
       
*      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
be>
       
*      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to