I think in this case (of maintainers list being shown above the actual list of issues), that that's a developer-centric goal more than a user-centric goal.
Most people already have all sorts of anxiety about "I'm not as good as that." I think the maintainers list could tend to reinforce the star power of a few people, but that's a whole psychological question. A note that I'd rather look at the issue queue itself than a maintainers summary to decide whether to use a module. Anyhow, strong vote here for the issues links having a higher priority than the list of top maintainers. The maintainers list is useful! It's good. But why give links that FEW people will click on a higher listing than links that MANY people will click on? It doesn't make sense. Margie On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Gábor Hojtsy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Margie Roswell <[email protected]> wrote: > > I decided that I like it. Though I think it would be better if the > > Maintainers block were listed below the other two issue blocks. The > Issues > > block is the far more important one for most users, and shouldn't risk > being > > too far "below the fold" on mobile devices. > > Well, the redesign goal is to get people featured: show that there are > many individuals working on these projects (bug community); show that > they worked recently on the project (or not), and so on. These help > show that Drupal is a community and help users to decide whether a > project is active or not. This will not be the only way which help > people make decisions in module selection, but is part of that. > > Gábor > -- Margie http://www.BaltimoreUrbanAg.org http://www.FriendlyCoffeehouse.org http://www.packtpub.com/drupal-5-views-recipes/book
