Yes you're right. Your question means you want to have a single taxonomy and share it across groups...you would have to use Views for that. You would clone the taxonomy_term view that ships with Views and add an argument that filters nodes by group membership.
You should install the advanced_help module. That's how you get detailed help on Views and a lot of other important modules as well. On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Paolo Mainardi<[email protected]> wrote: > But with og_vocab after i need to create new vocabularies for every new > group created, i'm right ? > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Earl Dunovant <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Try the OG Vocabulary module. It lets each group have it's own taxonomy. >> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Paolo Mainardi<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Dear All, >> > >> > I need your opinion and suggestions on a (for me) complicated task. >> > >> > I have OG + Taxonomy (views on taxonomy/term) + Pathauto + Some content >> > types >> > >> > Now, i need to achieve this task, when you are in a node (og context) >> > taxonomy links must be have something relative to og, for example: >> > >> > "/taxonomy/term/$tid/$og->nid" (for example passing last argument to >> > views >> > for fitering only og nodes with this taxonomy term) (consider that i'm >> > using >> > Pathauto, so taxonomy/term it's aliased for example on >> > "category/$category_name"). >> > >> > I tried with custom_url_rewrite but it's not a so simple task and with >> > hook_menu trying to create on the fly all this path (but it's a little >> > bit >> > strong in terms of cpu cycles...). >> > >> > I'm using D5. >> > >> > Please, someone could suggest me the right way ? :) Thank you very >> > much!!! >> > :) >> > >> > -- >> > Paolo Mainardi >> > >> > CTO Twinbit >> > Blog: http://www.paolomainardi.com >> > >> > -- Please consider the environment before printing this email -- >> > > > > > -- > Paolo Mainardi > > CTO Twinbit > Blog: http://www.paolomainardi.com > > -- Please consider the environment before printing this email -- >
