I don't know that I'd agree with the reason for denying it being valid.
I'd say that with regards to the question posed earlier, it makes sense
to approve a module that has 1 line of code, if that code is going to be
use to the community. Denying the community the functionality, or
telling several (dozens, hundreds, thousands?) of people to go code it
themselves because it's trivial to do, but not trivial enough to add to
core, doesn't seem like the right approach. If it's useful, a module
makes sense.
- Re: [development] new features in D6 core? Larry Garfield
- Re: [development] new features in D6 core? Cameron Eagans
- Re: [development] new features in D6 core? Andrew Schulman
- Re: [development] new features in D6 cor... Gerhard Killesreiter
- Re: [development] new features in D6... Jeff Greenberg
- Re: [development] new features in D6... Andrew Schulman
- [development] CVS Approval Poli... Bill Fitzgerald
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Dave Reid
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Kevin Reynen
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Andrew Schulman
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Jeff Greenberg
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Dave Reid
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Jeff Greenberg
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Ashraf Amayreh
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Pierre Rineau
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Ashraf Amayreh
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Pierre Rineau
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Daniel F. Kudwien
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Ashraf Amayreh
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Moshe Weitzman
- Re: [development] CVS Appro... Damien Tournoud
