Greetings Everyone,
Is anybody care to collaborate on this (see below)?
<http://drupal.org/node/547518> location contain this:
Why Not to Use Classes
The above hopefully clarifies the ways in which Drupal embodies
various OOP concepts. Why, then, doesn't Drupal move in the direction
of using classes to solve these problems in the future? Some of the
reasons are historical, and were discussed earlier. Others, though,
become clearer now that we have stepped through some of the design
patterns used in Drupal.
A good example is the extensibility of the theme system. A theme
defines functions for each of the interface elements it wants to
display in a special way. As noted earlier, this makes themes seem
like a good candidate to inherit from an abstract base class that
defines the default rendering of the elements.
What happens, though, when a module is added that adds a new interface
element? The theme should be able to override the rendering of this
element as well, but if a base class is defined, the new module has no
way of adding another method to that class. Complicated patterns could
be set up to emulate this behavior, but Drupal's theme architecture
quite elegantly handles the situation using its own function dispatch
system. In this case and others like it, the classes that on the
surface would seem to simplify the system would end up making it more
cumbersome and difficult to extend.
Question is what about using already existing in PHP 5 overloading
feature <http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.overloading.php>?
Does authors of article on <http://drupal.org/node/547518> know about
overloading feature?
Could authors or anybody explain this misconception?
Or point me out to already existed discussion on OOP subject.
Thanks in advance