nan wich wrote:
I didn't write the guidelines. I just seem to be the only one who has
read them. If you want to argue about them, then it should be with the
powers-that-be who own those guidelines.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Brian Vuyk
I tend to think that two related modules probably make a good 'package',
so they can be found together even with alphabetically distant names.
The point of my earlier email is that we are the enforcers of the
guidelines. The guidelines state 4 to 5 or more modules with the same
purpose could be group by a package. The guidelines state that a
package with 4 to 5 or more sub-module could create its own package.
But there is no guideline for what to make the package name. It only
lists a few that were valid at the time the guidelines were written.
Maybe it is time for the guidelines to be revisited.
--
Earnie
-- http://progw.com
-- http://www.for-my-kids.com
