This is making less and less sense. I've rebooted my dev station (OS X) and the web server, and moved to jquery update 6.2_alpha, which loads jquery 1.3.2, and configuring that module to load the 'development' uncompressed version... now FireBug errors on jquery line 1296, claiming "reference to undefined property jQuery.cache[id][name]".
Moving to the Google Chrome browser, everything loads and runs fine with no errors. Sounds like FireFox is sick... Being curious, I just tried loading my project on my wife's MacBook, with fireFox & fireBug - loads with no error. Same version of FireFox & FireBug too... Sincerely, -Blake bsenft...@earthlink.net www.BlakeSenftner.com On Feb 4, 2011, at 7:18 PM, Blake Senftner wrote: > Seems like I'm finding instances of people posting requests for help with > this, but no solutions seem to accompany these posts... > > I tried installing the JQuery Update module, whose README says just install > and enable, but the same jquery 1.2.6 is still being loaded... what's up with > that? > > Sincerely, > -Blake > bsenft...@earthlink.net > www.BlakeSenftner.com > > On Feb 4, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Blake Senftner wrote: > >> Environment: latest D6 in WAMP on a Windows Server 2008 R2. >> >> The strangest error just started occurring within firebug: The first code >> line of the standard Drupal jquery file (jQuery 1.2.6) is generating an >> error. Firebug says that line 13 has a "test for equality (==) mistyped as >> an assignment (=)?" >> >> And because of this new, I have no idea how this could have started, bug... >> I am unable to continue work on a Services 3.0 based framework where I'm >> using java script to test the RESTful API I'm developing. (I guess I can >> test it with php, but I'd have to rewrite my testing framework all over.) >> >> The only thing I can think that I did which could have impacted this is run >> cron, but that does not really make any sense... >> >> I found this similar situation post >> http://drupal.org/node/846026?mode=2&sort=2 , but that is not the same >> error, but it is the same line and the same unaltered jQuery source file... >> has anyone else encountered this? If so, what did you do to fix it? >> >> Sincerely, >> -Blake >> bsenft...@earthlink.net >> www.BlakeSenftner.com >
