Honestly, I don't get why there's a fuss about it. How much volume does this list get specifically dedicated to core development, any way?
It's not like it's a high volume list. It's not like it's a big deal to answer questions that someone might have even though it's not specifically related to core development. Regards, Todd On 10 May 2012, at 05:39, luca capra wrote: > Wouldn't be better have a clear distinction of lists like core-dev@ / > contrib-dev@ / support@ ? > > > Il 09/05/2012 19:33, Cameron Eagans ha scritto: >> Ditto. These lists aren't useful at all. Unsubscribing from both. >> --
