I second that. And prefer the small memory available to be used by the programs, not the shell.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Inouk Bourgon <[email protected]>wrote: > Bad idea for a stock firmware imo. Dropbear has a smaller memory footprint. > > But nothing prevents you to implement it in your own Fonera and see if you > have enough space for it and how it performs. > > Inouk > > On 10/26/2010 02:02 PM, Paolo Valleri wrote: > >> Hi, >> Could we replace dropbear with the standard openssh-{client,server}? >> >> Openssh features (not available in dropbear): >> - reverse forward >> - potenzial integration with denyhost (to improve security!) >> - fuse support >> - a few options available to customize the server >> >> I know that dropbear takes less space but I think this features are >> enough to justify the replacement. >> >> I also think that the fonera both 2.0g and 2.0n versions have enough >> memory and cpu performance to support the replacement. >> >> what do you think? >> >> Paolo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://fonosfera.org/mailman/listinfo/development >> > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://fonosfera.org/mailman/listinfo/development > -- [] Alexandre Strube [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://fonosfera.org/mailman/listinfo/development
