Overall, I rather like this document. About my only nitpick about the actual content is the
>> Leaders of any group, such as moderators of mailing lists, IRC channels, forums, etc., will exercise the right to suspend access to any person Needs to be clarified if they are _expected_ to exercise the right, or _have full authority_ (but it's at their discretion) to excercise it. On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:24 PM NIkolai Marchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you witness others being attacked, think first about how you can > offer them personal support. > > > As a first step when problems arise, consider reminding those involved > of our Code of Conduct. > > these... kinda contradict each other. Just a minor nitpick. I do not > disagree, just that the priorities conflict > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:17 PM Edward Welbourne <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:45 PM Edward Welbourne <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Just an update on the CoC review: we've now reached the point where >> five >> >> of us are happy to give it a +1. This would be a good time to review >> it >> >> if you'd like to see what we've ended up with or have things to say >> >> about the general principle of even having a CoC at all. Absent >> >> dissenting voices, it's looking a lot like we have consensus ... >> >> NIkolai Marchenko (6 December 2018 20:47) replied: >> > Can you link to the current draft? >> >> Good point: >> * review: https://codereview.qt-project.org/243623 >> * generated: >> https://quips-qt-io.herokuapp.com/quip-0012-Code-of-Conduct.html >> >> Eddy. >> >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
