On Monday, 7 de November de 2011 23:10:03 Olivier Goffart wrote: > I know the difference. > But still, that API can be disabled for compiler not supporting that > feature (as this was the case wth QtConcurrent on symbian, or as this was > the case with QObject::findChildren<> on VC6)
We should really avoid that. The VC6 suppressions were bad and thankfully a
thing of the past. But QtConcurrent not being available with RVCT is the
perfect example: a major Qt feature is not available.
In reality, we won't have a major creep in of features, but over time it could
happen. Imagine a Q_DECLARE_METATYPE with variadic macros to solve the problem
of the comma in templates. As soon as people start using that in their code,
which would be soon, a C99 preprocessor is mandatory.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
