On 11/10/11 2:00 AM, "ext [email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 10 Nov, 2011, at 00:41 , ext Rick Stockton wrote: >> Should we do them all as one update, or do xlib first -- and add the >>more widely used xcb as a separate update, after the first one is found >>NOT to cause regression test failures over the next weekend? (BTW, I >>don't know how to do the Git Clone and Request procedure, and I'm a slow >>learner-- it would REALLY be better if I simply emailed these files to >>you.) Changes are public domain, of course - I think that I've already >>certified acceptance of the Qt license exceptions for my Contributions. > >Gerrit is not hard to use at all. It's where all code is reviewed and >integrated into Qt once approved. I don't think the contribution >agreement allows someone to contribute your code for you either (it's >been a while since I read it, and IANAL either). > >See http://wiki.qt-project.org/Main_Page, particularly the 4 links under >"Tooling" Correct, original author will have to contribute it him/herself, or else the original author would have to sign paper documents which would have be (snail)mailed to the Nokia - Oslo office. My guess is that following the few steps on the wiki to successfully push your patch(es), would be a better use of your time. :-) Sorry Rick, but then again, then next time you wish to contribute it'll be super easy ;) -- .marius _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
