On 22 November 2011 01:11, <[email protected]> wrote: > I would suggest that the Qt source should include its own local copy of pcre > and a configure time switch should allow selection between the system or the > local (Qt source) version of pcre. This is already the approach offered for > things like image-related plugins (libpng, libjpg, etc.).
That's doable, I guess. Does that change somehow the minimum version requirement of pcre? That is: say we put the latest PCRE in Qt (with all the features available). Should the code be able to compile and run with older PCRE versions or not? (I think that the discussion about qtsupport itself should fork from this thread...) -- Giuseppe D'Angelo _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
