On Tuesday, 6 de December de 2011 13.56.18, Jonas Gastal wrote: > Sorry if this is a stupid point, but there is a pretty standard mechanism > for > multiprocess "mutexes" in the form of ".lock" files. Isn't this an obvious > and > acceptable solution(to that part of the issue)? They have the same up/down > sides of actual mutexes.
Yes, it is, provided you do the lock file operations correctly (which isn't a
given).
I was just saying that you can't use QMutex. You need to use a different kind
of mutex.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
