Hi Henry, On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:18 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > This page introduces the Qt Project playground (a low-barrier area for > experimenting with new ideas), gives some naming guidelines for modules > and tools, and documents the module repository structure.
Thanks for getting this started. I have two small points: > Agree with a Qt maintainer that s/he will approve your new playground project Can we agree that this approval should be done on development@? That way, the discussion around the suggestion is visible and (if needed) someone could raise concerns, point out areas of interest like past research, etc. I don't think that would end up too verbose, after alll, this shouldn't happen too often. Having these on a list also mirrors the structure for approval nomination. > Send your request for a new Playground project (including project name and > description) to the Qt maintainer from whom you have pre-approval. > CC to sergio.ahumada at nokia.com and Gerrit Expert Group (email address TBD). I think I'd prefer to see this on an infra@ type list, again, so people can keep informed (if they want), and there's no need to change CCs and get outdated information over time. There's also then an archive of this stuff happening, which is usually a good thing. The rest looks quite useful & informative, will take a bit longer to digest the technical content rather than the process bits. :) BR, Robin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
