On Friday, 23 de December de 2011 15.37.31, Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Friday 23 December 2011 11:30:08 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Uploaded at: > > > > https://qt.gitorious.org/~thiago-intel/qt/thiago-intels-qtbase/commits/new > > - > > qglobalstatic > > I'm trying to review: > > You cannot use the QMutexPool in the QGlobalStaticControler. > Because the creation of the global static will run user code that might > create others global statics, or do something else that will also use the > same mutex pool. Or just locking other mutex. (hence locking multilples > mutex, which may mean deadlock) > (Especially since global statics might also be created under a lock or > something)
When I wrote the implementation, the mutex pool was safe and never ran global
statics.
I'd support going back to that.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
