On Tuesday, 3 de January de 2012 10.57.11, [email protected] wrote: > Unfortunately, OpenSSL is not part of the LSB, so if you want SSL support on > linux and you want your application to be LSB compliant, you end up having > to link in the OpenSSL libraries statically. That's not necessarily a bad > thing from a security point of view, but it is an annoyance. NSS, on the > other hand, *is* in the LSB. If NSS was able to meet Qt's needs, then it > would be useful to have a NSS backend. Obviously, if NSS has issues as you > mentioned, then that makes it a bit of a moot point. I don't think GnuTLS > is in the LSB, but the LSB navigator site is currently down so I can't > easily check.
I remember voicing my concerns about NSS when LSB decided to standardise on
it. The reason was then that Qt could *not* use NSS, since it was developed in
the US.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
