On Wednesday, 4 de January de 2012 01.53.44, [email protected] wrote: > >From the QtDeclarative point of view, apart from having our tests pass, I'd > >like to see some comparisons in QML load time, using photoviewer as a test > >case, for example. > Looks like performance was an important consideration in the new > implementation, but I'd like to see confirmation :-)
I've run all the benchmarks I could on the photoviewer example. I managed to
crash my system twice while doing hardware event collection.
The impact of the QUrl changes in the example is: inconclusive
QUrl's contribution to the example is negligible in both cases. The number of
samples collected in QUrl functions is way too small to enable any kind of
insight. I cannot even conclude which functions were *called*.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
