On Thursday, 19 de January de 2012 19.32.23, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:24:22PM +0200, ext Robin Burchell wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenha...@nokia.com> wrote: > > > i made an attempt to give the digia group on gerrit the right to create > > > the branch 4.7-digia > > > > why not just put it in 4.7, so they're one and the same, > > because they *aren't* the same. the digia patches are not > community-approved by the respective domain experts. the qt project > cannot simply accept this, be if for trademark reasons.
Remember that the Qt community is the only one allowed to release official
versions of Qt and set the version number.
So Digia is operating under special conditions right now, due to the lack of
Qt4 in Gerrit. Once it stabilises, I'd rather not see Digia release a
commercial version with a version number that the official Qt doesn't have yet.
That might imply they need a second version number. E.g.:
Qt Commercial 4.7.5 update 1
which indicates it's the Qt Commercial vendor branch, based on the official Qt
4.7.5, but it's an update to something previously released.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
