Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Friday, 27 de January de 2012 16.14.03, João Abecasis wrote: > > Thoughts? Comments? > > After thinking some more about this, my current thinking is: > > drop the -no-stl support
For the record, I'm all for this [1]. That, however, is a bigger change that deserves it's own discussion. Lars should have a say and I'd also be interested in hearing what "QtCommercial" has to say -- if they have an opinion, that is. Some points for further consideration: * Does that include everything in the standard library, or only the inline template stuff? Some things, like <iostream> (<locale>?) don't make a lot of sense for us to use. Others like <thread> and <atomic> are interesting to at least consider in the context of C++11. (<regex>?) Do we need an explicit policy or is common sense sufficient? * Do we allow standard library types in our interfaces/ABI? In general, I would think not. Still most standard libraries keep their ABIs stable for long periods of time such that it might not be a big issue to allow *some* types to go in our ABI. Cheers, João [1] See, e.g., http://codereview.qt-project.org/13994 _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
