On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 22:50:51 you wrote: > Few comments from my side: > > * Agree with Thiago, that the class should be value based and called > QTimeZone > * I think such a class would be good to have in QtCore, but > * I'd prefer if we don't have to ship the database. As noted it can change > easily > and a compiled in database would get out of sync. > * ICU has timezone support as well. Something that could simplify our life?
Wouldn't that be out of sync too? What is the ICU timezone support? > * Do we need to support both the Windows and Unix format, or could we get > away with Unix only in a first version (if e.g. ICU provides the data)? I think this is 5.x material anyway. I think it would need somewhat more involved discussion. I've removed the bug from the 5.0 blockers list. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
