On 2/13/12 5:52 PM, "ext Stephen Kelly" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Friday, February 03, 2012 12:17:35 [email protected] wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >It seems like this change broke qt/qttools, can you confirm this >>please ? >> >> I'd assume qttools doesn't include the qtquick1 repo as a dependency. > >It needs declarative in Qt4 because lupdate uses it to extract >translations. > >This raises the question of whether lupdate will also need to use the Qt5 >declarative module to extract QML2 translations, or will the language and >features remain static so that the qtquick features will also be >sufficient. It should be. Let's fix it once the renaming is done. > >On Monday, February 06, 2012 07:58:04 [email protected] wrote: >> Yes, we are working on renaming the classes in the declarative module to >> either Qml... or QQuick... depending on case. There will be a period >>where >> using QtQuick 1 and 2 together is not possible, but we will sort this >>out >> as quickly as we can, hopefully without causing big disruptions to >>users of >> either library. > >This raises the question of whether the Qt5/declarative module will be >renamed (if all classes in it are renamed Qml*) and if the module >includes will be moved. > > >The followup question is whether the qtqtuick1 module can be renamed >QtDeclarative so that there is less source incompatibility (of the >buildsystem and module includes). See my comment on https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-23737 . It's WIP. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
