2012/2/15 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>
> On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2012 09.53.29, aaron.kenn...@nokia.com > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 15/02/2012, at 9:44 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > How big are the Qt Quick 1 language support classes? I'm asking so we > can > > > have an idea of how much maintenance effort those classes will be. I > > > assume that they will continue to use V8, which will be continually > > > updated and modified to support Qt Quick 2 and that introduces risk of > > > regressions and breakages. > > No. They would literally be copies of the 4.8 classes, so would rely on > > QtScript and JSC and not V8. > > That's even more work to be maintained. Are we prepared to do that? > > How's the compatibility going so far? If they are using today the V8 > engine, I > assume you've taken steps to keep compatibility issues limited. Why can't > we > keep on using that? > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027 > Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > > Just a simple point of view from someone that likes QML and plays with it a lot. Why would you still support QML 1? Qt5 is going to have QML 2 which should be superior to QML 1 in about every single way so why not just drop it for Qt5?
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development