Yes David, Absolutely right. B.R. WB
-----Original Message----- From: ext David Faure [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 8:08 PM To: Koehne Kai (Nokia-MP/Berlin) Cc: Beck Wolfgang (Nokia-MP/Brisbane); [email protected] Subject: Re: [Development] QLog ( Work on qDebug and friends) On Tuesday 21 February 2012 10:02:23 [email protected] wrote: > I agree with that: On the desktop it's quite handy to see also > detailed output on stderr/the shell (which one can redirect to a file if > needed). > But I also think that qLog() messages shouldn't show up by default for > normal users, that is, unless the category has been explicitly enabled. True. > So how about adding another QtMsgType called QLogMsg, that qLog() > uses? In contrast to qDebug/QtDebugMsg, qLog/QtLogMsg messages would > not be processed by default, unless the configuration file (or an > environment > variable) says so ... Isn't the same information given by "a category is present in the QMessageLogContext"? All qLog calls are forced to get a category, right? -- David Faure | [email protected] | KDE/Qt Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
