It might be that this was indeed an oversight. Can you create a bug report and assign it to me (I am not promising I have time to fix it now, or you can fix qdoc yourself and add me as reviewer ;-) )
Casper On 3/8/12 3:56 AM, "ext Girish Ramakrishnan" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Lincoln Ramsay <[email protected]> >wrote: >> On 03/03/2012 02:25 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> On sexta-feira, 2 de março de 2012 18.01.15, Denis Shienkov wrote: >>>> The fact is that if the names of class methods and the same >>>>properties names >>>> - then QDoc ignores the description for the methods. >>> >>> That's intentional. You document the property. The getter and setter >>>methods >>> do not need to be documented. >> >> I like this, but I don't like that you must explicitly document the >> NOTIFY signal for a property. >> >> Is there a particular reason that NOTIFY signals aren't handled the same >> as getters and setters? >> > >I think this is just an oversight. qdoc wasn't fixed after NOTIFY >support was fully added. > >Girish >_______________________________________________ >Development mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
