On 3/8/12 4:22 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
>On quinta-feira, 8 de março de 2012 11.34.04, Alexis Menard wrote: >> > So, the barrier for Qt5 is a compiler that supports C++0x? Not a bad >>idea. >> >> I didn't said anything about C++0x and I seriously don't think this >> should be the barrier. I was more talking about compiler buggy with >> templates for example. > >I was proposing that the barrier of entry is that the compiler supports >C++98. Yes. That has actually been agreed quite some time ago, and right now I do not want to change that. The compiler has to be C++98 compliant. We *don't* require any C++11, although we try to integrate with it. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
