Hi. Yes, something like this.
Best regards, Denis 13.03.2012, 00:47, "1+1=2" <dbzhang...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Davet Jacques <davetjacq...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I went over it and fixed most of >> the text to make it grammatically correct and nicer to read, but I don't >> understand what the following paragraph is supposed to mean (in the >> "SerialPort" section): >>> For the standard implementation of the internal structure and interfaces >>> was adopted class QAbstractSocket, as one of the most suitable in >>> terms of functionality. In this case, the internal structure used by >>> QAbstractSocket, was significantly revised and simplified. >> "standard implementation" >> >> Are >> there multiple implementations? Or is it simply supposed to refer to >> the "core" / "technical foundation" of the implementation? >> >> "internal structure and interfaces was adopted ..." >> "internal structure [...] was significantly revised and simplified" >> >> Does this mean ... >> >> - SerialPort is a subclass of QAbstractSocket? >> or >> - SerialPort is a fork of QAbstractSocket? >> or >> - SerialPort is inspired by QAbstractSocket / follows the API-conventions >> defined by QAbstractSocket? > > In my opinion, It should be this: > SerialPort is inspired by QAbstractSocket, and their implementation > have similiar architecture. > > Best regards, > > Debao > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development