On Friday, March 16, 2012 11:52:15 Anselmo L. S. Melo wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/16/2012 11:45 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > On Thursday, March 15, 2012 18:42:46 Anselmo L. S. Melo wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> A few weeks ago we requested a playground repository to do experiments > >> with the non-widgets classes that are now in QtWidgets, but are useful > >> for application development using QtQuick2. More details in this > >> thread: > >> > >> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2012-February/002150 > >> .html > >> > >> We have just pushed the first results to the playground repo: > >> > >> The classes moved out of QtWidgets up to now are: > >> - QUndoStack, QUndoCommand, QUndoGroup > >> - QFileSystemModel > >> - QStandardItemModel > >> - QAction > > > > It might be a good idea to move QProxyModel out to there too. It has > > been obsolete for a long time. > > > > > > http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/4.8/qproxymodel.html > > Thanks for the suggestion. > > > Will the classes be removed from QtWidgets before the 5.0 release? > > AFAIK no, QtWidgets continue untouched.
Hmm, QProxyModel is obsolete so long that it might make sense to remove it from QtWidgets and point people who want to keep using it to the UiHelpers thing. Will that be released as a Qt Addon? Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
