On Friday 30 March 2012 15:35:40 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 30 de março de 2012 18.41.46, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > On Friday 30 March 2012 12:23:59 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > Use of QVarLengthArray should *only* be done with primitive types, the > > > fixes applied to it during Qt 4.x lifetime notwithstanding. So the user > > > must know that before he uses that class. If he's not sure, use QVector. > > > > That is wrong. QVarLenghtArray can be use with every types. > > That statement ^^^ > > > > Also, QVarLengthArray should zero-initialise, but it doesn't. > > > > It is documented not to. > > And this statement ^^^ > > Are in contradiction. If it doesn't zero-initialise, then it doesn't > initialise. Then using it for non-PODs is dangerous. > > If it supports any type, then it must initialise them all.
It initialize the types that are not marked as Q_PRIMITIVE_TYPE. The documentation even says that it is only primitive types that are not initialized > > > But yes, it probably should. (we can add a Qt::Uninitialized overload if > > we need it) > > I'd rather we removed support for non-primitives. The class wasn't designed > for that. It was designed for that, and works well. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
